xe_sriov_vf_init_late(9)
π xe_sriov_vf_init_late(9) π
okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual β¨ β yes this is literally the kernel manual, and yes we're about to make SR-IOV VF late init make sense. π«Ά
πΈ NAME πΈ
xe_sriov_vf_init_late β the SR-IOV VF late initialization functions, periodt. π
β¨ SYNOPSIS β¨
int xe_sriov_vf_init_late (struct xe_device *xe );
that's it, that's the whole vibe check π₯
π¦ ARGUMENTS π¦
xeβ thexe_deviceto initialize π (yes, THE device, the main character of this function)
π DESCRIPTION π
so this function does one very specific iconic thing: it initializes code for CCS migration. that's it. that's the whole job. no cap. π§
π RETURN π
0on success π (slay)- a negative error code on failure π (not slay, but fr fr that's how it goes)
π SEE ALSO π
- Kernel file
./drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.cβ go read it, iykyk π VF restore procedure in PF KMD and VF KMD(9)xe_sriov_vf_migration_supported(9)xe_sriov_vf_migration_disable(9)xe_sriov_vf_init_early(9)xe_sriov_vf_debugfs_register(9)
π reminder bestie:xe_sriov_vf_init_lateis the late one. if you wanted the early one, that'sxe_sriov_vf_init_early(9)β don't mix them up, i'm begging π
and that's a wrap, babe π
source vibe check: it's from ./drivers/gpu/drm/xe, dated October 2026, and the page itself is xe_sriov_vf_init_late(9) β mwah, go initialize those VFs responsibly ππ
π¦ where this page comes from
- nixpkgs unstable: linux-manual 7.3.1
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms