xe_sriov_pf_assert_vfid(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… xe_sriov_pf_assert_vfid(9) πŸ’…

okay so this is a page from the Kernel API Manual, and honestly? it's a little vibe-check function for driver devs 🫢


✨ NAME ✨

xe_sriov_pf_assert_vfid β€” bestie, this one just warns you if &id isn't a supported VF number, but only when you're debugging πŸ’–


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

xe_sriov_pf_assert_vfid (xe , vfid );

that's the whole thing, no cap. two args, in and out, done ✨


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • xe β€” the PF xe_device you're asserting on. like, the actual physical function device, the main character πŸ‘‘
  • vfid β€” the VF number you wanna assert. the number under scrutiny, fr fr πŸ”

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

okay so here's the tea πŸ“: this asserts that xe actually represents the Physical Function (PF) device, and that the vfid you handed it is inside the range of supported VF numbers. that range goes up to the max number of VFs the driver can support β€” and yes, that includes VF0, which represents the PF itself πŸ’… lowkey important detail, don't forget it.

so it's checking two things at once: right device, right number. iconic behavior, honestly 🌈


⭐ NOTE ⭐

heads up bestie 😭 this is effective only on debug builds. so if you're on a non-debug build, don't expect it to do anything β€” it's giving "not me showing up to the party that isn't happening" πŸ’€

for the full deets, see Xe Asserts_ πŸ’œ


πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

the whole friend group, slay πŸ‘‘


aaaand that's the page!! πŸŽ€ byeee, this one lives in ./drivers/gpu/drm/xe, dated October 2026 β€” so like, future vibes only πŸ¦‹βœ¨πŸ’–

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from