xe_hw_engin...out_in_range(9)
β¨ NAME β¨
xe_hw_engine_timeout_in_range β bestie, it's literally just a lil helper that checks if a timeout is in range π
So this is from the Kernel API Manual, and the star of the show is xe_hw_engine_timeout_in_range(9). That's the whole vibe, okay?
πΈ SYNOPSIS πΈ
bool xe_hw_engine_timeout_in_range (u64 timeout , u64 min , u64 max );
Like, it takes three u64s and hands you back a bool. Clean. Simple. Iconic. π
π¦ ARGUMENTS π¦
timeoutβ the timeout you're validating, aka the thing we're putting under the microscope πminβ the min value of the valid range, the floor, the lower bound, the "no going below this" line β¬οΈmaxβ the max value of the valid range, the ceiling, the upper bound, the "that's far enough" line β¬οΈ
π DESCRIPTION π
Okay so picture this: this helper exists to validate whether timeout is sitting all cozy inside the minβmax range of the HW engine scheduler. That's it. That's the job. It checks the range, it slays, it goes home. No cap. β¨
π₯ RETURN π₯
- Returns
falsefor failure π - Returns
truefor success π
So like, a vibe check result, essentially. true means you're in range and thriving; false means nope.
π«Ά SEE ALSO π«Ά
- Kernel file
./drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine_class_sysfs.c xe_hw_engine_class_sysfs_init(9)
Go read those if you're obsessed and want more (iykyk) π
And that's the whole page, bestie! π Shoutout to the source over at ./drivers/gpu/drm/xe, dated October 2026, and to the page itself, xe_hw_engin...out_in_range(9) β mwah, no notes ππ
π¦ where this page comes from
- nixpkgs unstable: linux-manual 7.3.1
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms