xattr_full_name(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

✨ xattr_full_name(9) β€” from the Kernel API Manual, bestie ✨

okay so you found the page for xattr_full_name, and honestly? she's a little helper with main character energy πŸ’… let's get into it.


🌸 NAME 🌸

xattr_full_name β€” computes the full attribute name from a suffix. that's it, that's the gig πŸŽ€


πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

const char * xattr_full_name (const struct xattr_handler *handler ,
const char *name );

πŸ’– ARGUMENTS πŸ’–

  • handler β€” the handler of the xattr_handler operation 🫢 like, the one who owns the prefix, yk?
  • name β€” the name that got passed to the xattr_handler operation ✨

🌈 DESCRIPTION 🌈

okay so picture this: the get and set xattr handler operations get called with the remainder of the attribute name, right? like, after the handler's prefix has been skipped πŸ‘€ so for example, "foo" is what gets passed to the get operation of a handler whose prefix is "user.", and that's how you get the attribute "user.foo".

and the whole time? the full name is still right there β€” "there" in the name. like it never left, it's just hiding behind the prefix πŸ₯Ί iconic behavior honestly.


πŸ”₯ NOTE πŸ”₯

heads up bestie, this one matters: the list xattr handler operation, when it's called from the vfs, gets passed a NULL name 😭 and some file systems use this operation internally, with varying semantics β€” so like, don't assume it always means the same thing, iykyk πŸ’€


πŸ‘‘ SEE ALSO πŸ‘‘

Kernel file ./fs/xattr.c β€” and the whole squad:


and that's the page!! 🧚 from ./fs, dated October 2026, and yeah β€” it's xattr_full_name(9) all the way down. slay, go read the whole crew, ily, bye πŸ’œπŸ“

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from