ww_mutex_init(9)
π ww_mutex_init(9) β like, the w/w mutex glow-up page π
okay bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual, this is ww_mutex_init and she's literally the only way to set your w/w mutex up properly, no cap. let's get into it π
β¨ NAME β¨
ww_mutex_init β initialize the w/w mutex π¦
β¨ SYNOPSIS β¨
void ww_mutex_init (struct ww_mutex *lock , struct ww_class *ww_class );
β¨ ARGUMENTS β¨
lockβ the mutex you're about to initialize, bestie. this is the one getting the glow-up πww_classβ the w/w class this mutex should belong to. gotta know her people π«Ά
β¨ DESCRIPTION β¨
so what this does is it initializes the w/w mutex into the unlocked state and associates it with the class you handed it. that's the whole vibe check β¨
now hear me on this one: there is no static define macro for w/w mutexes. none. zero. not a thing. so this function right here is the only way to properly initialize the w/w mutex β it's giving main character energy because there's literally no other option π
π¨ and ngl, it is not allowed to initialize an already locked mutex. don't do it. that's the rule, periodt π
β¨ SEE ALSO β¨
- Kernel file
./include/linux/ww_mutex.hπ ww_acquire_init(9)ww_acquire_done(9)ww_acquire_fini(9)ww_mutex_lock(9)ww_mutex_lock_interruptible(9)ww_mutex_lock_slow(9)ww_mutex_lock_slow_interruptible(9)ww_mutex_is_locked(9)
go read the whole squad, iykyk π
that's the page, bestie!! this one's from ./include/linux, dated October 2026 β mwah, love that for us πππ§
π¦ where this page comes from
- nixpkgs unstable: linux-manual 7.3.1
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms