ww_mutex_init(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… ww_mutex_init(9) β€” like, the w/w mutex glow-up page πŸ’…

okay bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual, this is ww_mutex_init and she's literally the only way to set your w/w mutex up properly, no cap. let's get into it πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

ww_mutex_init β€” initialize the w/w mutex πŸ¦‹


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

void ww_mutex_init (struct ww_mutex *lock , struct ww_class *ww_class );

✨ ARGUMENTS ✨

  • lock β€” the mutex you're about to initialize, bestie. this is the one getting the glow-up πŸ’–
  • ww_class β€” the w/w class this mutex should belong to. gotta know her people 🫢

✨ DESCRIPTION ✨

so what this does is it initializes the w/w mutex into the unlocked state and associates it with the class you handed it. that's the whole vibe check ✨

now hear me on this one: there is no static define macro for w/w mutexes. none. zero. not a thing. so this function right here is the only way to properly initialize the w/w mutex β€” it's giving main character energy because there's literally no other option πŸ’…

🚨 and ngl, it is not allowed to initialize an already locked mutex. don't do it. that's the rule, periodt πŸ’€

✨ SEE ALSO ✨

go read the whole squad, iykyk 🌈


that's the page, bestie!! this one's from ./include/linux, dated October 2026 β€” mwah, love that for us πŸ’œπŸ“πŸ§š

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from