vringh_init_iotlb(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

okay bestie, this one's from the Kernel API Manual and it's giving "tiny function, big main character energy" β€” we're folding that manual name in right here at the top so nobody's confused πŸ’…βœ¨

πŸŽ€ NAME πŸŽ€

vringh_init_iotlb β€” initialize a vringh for a ring with IOTLB. that's the whole vibe, short and iconic πŸ¦‹


πŸ’– SYNOPSIS πŸ’–

int vringh_init_iotlb (struct vringh *vrh , u64 features , unsigned int
num , bool weak_barriers , struct vring_desc *desc , struct vring_avail
*avail , struct vring_used *used );

πŸ“ ARGUMENTS πŸ“

  • vrh β€” the vringh you're initializing. it's the one getting glowed up, lowkey the main character here πŸ‘‘
  • features β€” the feature bits for this ring. like its personality settings ✨
  • num β€” the number of elements. and yes, it has to be valid, we'll get to that 😭
  • weak_barriers β€” true if we only need memory barriers, not I/O. so like, barriers-lite 🧚
  • desc β€” the userspace descriptor pointer. point it at the descriptor situation πŸŽ€
  • avail β€” the userspace avail pointer. hand over the avail pointer, bestie 🫢
  • used β€” the userspace used pointer. and the used pointer too, don't forget πŸ’œ

πŸ”₯ DESCRIPTION πŸ”₯

Returns an error if num is invalid. that's literally the whole description, no cap β€” if num is invalid, it returns an error, periodt πŸ’€


🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈


and that's the page, bestie πŸ’– sourced from ./drivers/vhost, dated October 2026, and filed under vringh_init_iotlb(9) β€” slay, go initialize that ring πŸŽ€βœ¨πŸ¦‹

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from