vfio_file_enforced_coherent(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

✨ vfio_file_enforced_coherent ✨

okay bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual entry for vfio_file_enforced_coherent β€” yes that's a whole mouthful, yes it's giving main character energy, and yes we're gonna get through it together 🫢


πŸ’– NAME πŸ’–

vfio_file_enforced_coherent β€” returns true if the DMA associated with the VFIO file is always CPU cache coherent πŸ’…

like, always always. no cap.


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

bool vfio_file_enforced_coherent (struct file *file );

that's it. one function, one argument, returns a bool. iconic behavior honestly ✨


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • file β€” a VFIO group file or a VFIO device file πŸ¦‹ (either one works, she's flexible like that)

🧚 DESCRIPTION 🧚

so what does "enforced coherency" even mean, you ask? bestie, I'm so glad you did πŸ’œ

Enforced coherency means the IOMMU ignores things like the PCIe no-snoop bit in DMA transactions. like, it literally does not care, it's above all that drama πŸ™ˆ

A return of false indicates that the user has rights to access additional instructions such as wbinvd on x86 πŸ‘‘

⚠️ lowkey important: false here isn't just "nope, not coherent" β€” it's telling you the user has extra instruction access. read the return value carefully, bestie, it's carrying a lot of lore πŸ’€

πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

go read those next, iykyk 🌈


and that's the whole page, periodt πŸ’… this was vfio_file_enforced_coherent(9) from the Kernel API Manual, sourced from ./drivers/vfio, dated October 2026 β€” mwah, go touch some DMA transactions πŸ“πŸ’–

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from