verify_dfa(9)
okay so this is verify_dfa(9) from the Kernel API Manual π and we are about to vibe-check some tables. The assignment? Verify that transitions and states in the tables are in bounds. Itβs giving βtable babysitter with main character energy,β honestly. π
β¨ NAME β¨
verify_dfa β verify that transitions and states in the tables are in bounds. No cap, thatβs the whole job. π
πΈ SYNOPSIS πΈ
int verify_dfa (const struct aa_dfa *dfa );
π¦ ARGUMENTS π¦
dfaβ the dfa to test, and it is NOT NULL (do not come in here with a null dfa, bestie π).
π DESCRIPTION π
This function assumes dfa has gone through the first pass verification done by unpacking. So unpacking already did its little first-pass thing, and now verify_dfa is here for the bounds-check moment. Periodt. β¨
π₯ NOTE π₯
Heads up, bestie: this does not valid accept table values. Thatβs the caveat β keep it in mind. π
π RETURN π
Returns 0, else an error code on failure to verify. π
π SEE ALSO π
Kernel file ./security/apparmor/match.c and all these iconic little references:
unpack_table(9)verify_table_headers(9)dfa_free(9)aa_dfa_free_kref(9)remap_data16_to_data32(9)aa_dfa_unpack(9)aa_dfa_match_len(9)aa_dfa_match(9)aa_dfa_next(9)aa_dfa_match_until(9)aa_dfa_matchn_until(9)aa_dfa_leftmatch(9)
mwah π this pageβs source/version is ./security/apparmor, dated October 2026, and itβs signed verify_dfa(9) π«Ά
π¦ where this page comes from
- nixpkgs unstable: linux-manual 7.3.1
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms