vdo_flush_packer(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… vdo_flush_packer β€” like, the kernel API manual bestie edition ✨

okay so real talk, this is the page for vdo_flush_packer(9) β€” yes the (9) means it's a kernel API thang, we love a section-nine moment πŸŽ€


🌸 NAME 🌸

vdo_flush_packer β€” request that the packer flush asynchronously. that's it, that's the whole vibe. no cap πŸ’–


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

void vdo_flush_packer (struct packer *packer );

literally just one call, one pointer, zero drama πŸ¦‹


🫢 ARGUMENTS 🫢

  • packer β€” the packer to flush. like, this one. the one you're handing over. the main character of the operation πŸ‘‘

πŸ’… DESCRIPTION πŸ’…

okay so here's what actually goes down, and it's lowkey kind of elegant:

every bin that's holding at least two compressed data blocks will be written out. periodt. πŸ—‚οΈβœ¨ and any solitary pending VIOs β€” the lonely little single ones, bless them 😭 β€” get released from the packer. no binning, no waiting, they're free to go πŸ•ŠοΈ

meanwhile, while the flushing is in progress, any VIOs that get submitted to vdo_attempt_packing will be continued immediately, without even trying to pack them. like, don't even bother asking rn, the packer is busy, we're not packing, we're flushing, read the room πŸ’€

⚠️ and yes, that's real behaviour and not a glitch β€” during a flush, packing attempts get skipped on purpose. just so we're clear, bestie 🫢

πŸ‘€ SEE ALSO πŸ‘€

the kernel file itself, aka the source of truth:

  • ./drivers/md/dm-vdo/packer.c

and the whole friend group πŸ«‚ (all of these are (9) pages, keep up):


✧ο½₯゚ and that's the page!! ο½₯゚✧ this lil gem lives in ./drivers/md/dm-vdo, it's dated October 2026, and the whole thing is filed under vdo_flush_packer(9). go forth and flush asynchronously, bestie β€” ily, mwah πŸ’–πŸŽ€πŸ¦‹

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from