validate_re...ournal_entry(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’– validate_recovery_journal_entry(9) πŸ’–

ok so real talk, this is a page straight out of the Kernel API Manual β€” like, kernel-level, no cap β€” and it's about one (1) little function whose whole entire job is checking whether a recovery journal entry is valid or not. That's it. That's the vibe. Lowkey iconic of it. πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

validate_recovery_journal_entry β€” bestie, it validates a recovery journal entry. that's the whole thing. πŸ¦‹


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

int validate_recovery_journal_entry (const struct vdo *vdo , const
       struct recovery_journal_entry *entry );

look at her go 😭 returns an int, takes two const pointers, very demure, very mindful.


🫢 ARGUMENTS 🫢

  • vdo β€” the vdo. yes that's the whole description. she said "the vdo" and moved on, and honestly? main character energy. πŸ’…
  • entry β€” the entry we're validating. the one getting the vibe check. πŸ”

⭐ RETURN ⭐

VDO_SUCCESS or an error. that's it, that's the range β€” either slay or nope. πŸ”₯


🧚 SEE ALSO 🧚


no cap: every single one of those is a real function, so if you're going down the dm-vdo repair rabbit hole, you've got company. bring snacks. πŸ“

and that's the page, bestie!! πŸ’– source lives at ./drivers/md/dm-vdo, dated October 2026 β€” so like, future-core of it, we love to see it πŸ‘‘βœ¨πŸŒˆ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from