validate_new_device_config(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… validate_new_device_config(9) β€” a Kernel API Manual moment ✨

okay so bestie, welcome to the validate_new_device_config page, straight out of the Kernel API Manual. she's a little function with a big job and honestly? she ate. let's get into it πŸŽ€


🌸 NAME 🌸

validate_new_device_config β€” check whether a new device config represents a valid modification to an existing config.

like, is this new config actually allowed to happen, or is it giving chaos? that's the whole vibe check. πŸ¦‹


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

int validate_new_device_config (struct device_config *to_validate ,
struct device_config *config , bool may_grow , char **error_ptr );

yep, that's a int return, four arguments, and she's not messing around. πŸ’…


πŸ’– ARGUMENTS πŸ’–

  • to_validate β€” the new config we're checking. this is the main character of the operation, the one getting scrutinized πŸ”
  • config β€” the existing config. the baseline, the reference point, the "we were already here" energy πŸ‘‘
  • may_grow β€” set to true if growing the logical and physical size of the vdo is currently permitted. if it's false, bestie, no growing. periodt. 🌱
  • error_ptr β€” a pointer to hold the reason for any error. so if something goes wrong, this is where the why lives 😭

πŸ¦‹ RETURN πŸ¦‹

VDO_SUCCESS or an error.

that's it. that's the whole mood. either we slay or we don't πŸ’€


🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

okay this list is long, but every single one of these is invited to the group chat:

also the kernel file lives at ./drivers/md/dm-vdo/dm-vdo-target.c, so if you wanna go read the source, that's where she resides 🫢


lowkey reminder: this is kernel code, so the details matter a lot. no cap. don't go renaming flags or assuming behavior, okay? iykyk πŸ’œ

and that's the page, bestie ✨ this one's from ./drivers/md/dm-vdo, dated October 2026, and it's literally called validate_new_device_config(9) β€” iconic, no notes πŸ’…πŸŽ€

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from