uvd_v7_0_enc_ring_test_ib(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… uvd_v7_0_enc_ring_test_ib(9) β€” like, the NAME section, bestie

okay so picture this: you're deep in the Kernel API Manual, section 9, and you stumble on uvd_v7_0_enc_ring_test_ib β€” and yeah, that's the whole function name, she's long, she's iconic, we respect her πŸŽ€

uvd_v7_0_enc_ring_test_ib β€” literally just vibes-checking whether the UVD ENC IBs are working. that's it. that's the whole job. no cap πŸ”₯


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

int uvd_v7_0_enc_ring_test_ib (struct amdgpu_ring *ring , long timeout
);

so she takes an amdgpu_ring pointer and a long timeout, and hands you back an int. main character signature energy fr fr πŸ‘‘


🫢 ARGUMENTS 🫢

  • ring β€” the engine to test on. this is the one you're putting on the spot, no pressure babe πŸ’–
  • timeout β€” the timeout value, measured in jiffies, or alternatively MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT. so like, either you pick a number or you go full "wait forever" mode πŸ™ˆ

πŸ¦‹ SEE ALSO πŸ¦‹

lowkey this is the "you may also like" section and honestly the algorithm popped OFF πŸ’€

like. that's a whole friend group right there and every single one of them showed up to the function-name party πŸŽ‰


mwah πŸ’‹ that's the page!! sourced straight from ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu and stamped October 2026 β€” so go forth, test those ENC IBs, and slay βœ¨πŸŒˆπŸ‘‘

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from