uvd_v5_0_ring_emit_fence(9)
π uvd_v5_0_ring_emit_fence(9) π
okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual entry for uvd_v5_0_ring_emit_fence(9) β yes the page title is literally the same as the function name, iconic behavior honestly π
β¨ NAME β¨
uvd_v5_0_ring_emit_fence β emit an fence & trap command π§β¨
(yes, "an fence" β the original said it like that and I'm not about to gaslight you, fr fr)
πΈ SYNOPSIS πΈ
void uvd_v5_0_ring_emit_fence (struct amdgpu_ring *ring , u64 addr , u64
seq , unsigned flags );
so it's a void function β meaning it hands nothing back, it just does the thing and leaves, main character energy honestly π
π¦ ARGUMENTS π¦
ringβ anamdgpu_ringpointer π like, this is the ring we're writing into, bestieaddrβ the address πseqβ the sequence number π’flagsβ the fence related flags π© (fence-adjacent flags, if you will)
π₯ DESCRIPTION π₯
Write a fence and a trap command to the ring. that's it, that's the whole vibe. two commands, one function, no cap π«Ά
π SEE ALSO π
the kernel file lives right here, go peek:
Kernel file ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/uvd_v5_0.c
and the whole friend group of related functions, all showing up together like a group chat π§:
uvd_v5_0_ring_get_rptr(9)uvd_v5_0_ring_get_wptr(9)uvd_v5_0_ring_set_wptr(9)uvd_v5_0_hw_init(9)uvd_v5_0_hw_fini(9)uvd_v5_0_mc_resume(9)uvd_v5_0_start(9)uvd_v5_0_stop(9)uvd_v5_0_ring_test_ring(9)uvd_v5_0_ring_emit_ib(9)
ngl there's nothing dangerous or deprecated in here, it's just a lil fence-and-trap emitter. still, respect the ring, okay? π
β and that's a wrap! this page came from ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu, dated October 2026, and it's the uvd_v5_0_ring_emit_fence(9) manual entry. slay, go emit some fences ππβ¨
π¦ where this page comes from
- nixpkgs unstable: linux-manual 7.3.1
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms