usb_free_coherent(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… usb_free_coherent(9) β€” from the Kernel API Manual, bestie ✨

Okay so real talk, this one's a little function with one very important job, and it lives in the Kernel API Manual. Buckle up πŸŽ€


🌸 NAME 🌸

usb_free_coherent β€” the function that frees memory you got from usb_alloc_coherent(). That's it. That's the whole vibe. It's the cleanup crew 🧹✨


πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

void usb_free_coherent (struct usb_device *dev , size_t size , void
*addr , dma_addr_t dma );

Yes bestie, void return β€” it hands nothing back, it just does the thing πŸ‘‘


πŸ’– ARGUMENTS πŸ’–

  • dev β€” the device the buffer was used with 🫢 like, which device was this memory for? That one.
  • size β€” the requested buffer size πŸ“ the number you asked for originally, no cap.
  • addr β€” the CPU address of the buffer 🧠 the address from the CPU's point of view.
  • dma β€” the DMA address of the buffer 🚚 and this one's the address from the DMA side. Both addresses, both matter, don't skip either.

✨ DESCRIPTION ✨

So what this does is it reclaims an I/O buffer, which lowkey means letting it be reused β€” the memory goes back into circulation, main character energy for the buffer, honestly β™»οΈπŸ’«

🚨 BUT. And this is the part where you listen to me: the memory must have been allocated using usb_alloc_coherent, and the parameters must match those provided in that allocation request. Like, exactly. Same size, same everything. Fr fr, no improvising, no "close enough" β€” if you didn't get it from usb_alloc_coherent or the params don't line up, you're not slaying, you're just asking for trouble πŸ˜­πŸ’€

πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

Kernel file ./drivers/usb/core/usb.c β€” and then a whole group chat of friends, iykyk 🫢:


And that's the whole page, bestie πŸŽ€ this one came out of ./drivers/usb/core, dated October 2026, and it's filed under usb_free_coherent(9) β€” periodt πŸ’œβœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from