unregister_...ule_notifier(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

✨ unregister_tracepoint_module_notifier πŸ’…

okay bestie, quick vibe check: this is a Kernel API Manual page, section 9 of the manual, and the star of the show is unregister_tracepoint_module_notifier β€” say that five times fast, i cannot 😭


✨ NAME ✨

unregister_tracepoint_module_notifier β€” unregister tracepoint coming/going notifier πŸ¦‹

like, it's the un-register one. the "we're so done" one. the breakup text to the registration's "u up?" iykyk πŸ’”


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

int unregister_tracepoint_module_notifier (struct notifier_block *nb );

that's it. one argument, returns an int, it's giving minimalism and honestly? obsessed πŸŽ€


🎯 ARGUMENTS 🎯

  • nb β€” notifier block πŸ’–

that's the whole description. just "notifier block." no notes, iconic behavior, periodt πŸ‘‘


πŸ”₯ DESCRIPTION πŸ”₯

okay so here's the one (1) thing you actually need to internalize: the notifier block callback should expect a "struct tp_module" data pointer. 🫢

that's it. that's the lore. the callback gets a struct tp_module data pointer and it should be expecting it β€” no cap, don't be out here assuming it's something else πŸ’€


🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

literally the whole friend group right there, go read all of them, i'll wait β˜•πŸ’œ


ngl bestie, unregister_tracepoint_module_notifier is the cleanup arc. register it, do the thing, unregister it. balance. harmony. no leaks. πŸ§šβ€β™€οΈβœ¨

and that's the page, bestie!! πŸ₯³ source: ./kernel, filed under October 2026, Kernel API Manual, section 9 β€” mwah, go touch some tracepoints, ily, slay πŸŽ€πŸ’…πŸ’–

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from