tracepoint_p...egister_prio(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ¦‹ tracepoint_p...egister_prio(9) πŸ¦‹

okay so this is from the Kernel API Manual bestie, and it's literally the page for tracepoint_probe_register_prio β€” yes the title up there got cut off mid-word, the manpage generator was being dramatic πŸ™ˆ, but it's her, it's the register-with-priority one.


✨ NAME ✨

tracepoint_probe_register_prio β€” connect a probe to a tracepoint, but with priority πŸ’…


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

int tracepoint_probe_register_prio (struct tracepoint *tp , void *probe
, void *data , int prio );

like, that's the whole signature, no cap. four args, one int back.


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • tp β€” the tracepoint. that's the thing you're hooking onto 🫢
  • probe β€” the probe handler. the function that actually does the thing
  • data β€” tracepoint data. the lil payload that comes along for the ride
  • prio β€” priority of this function over other registered functions. yes bestie, it's a whole ranking system, main character energy for your handler πŸ‘‘

⭐ DESCRIPTION ⭐

returns 0 if ok, error value on error. that's it, that's the description πŸ’€ short and iconic.


πŸ”₯ NOTE πŸ”₯

listen up, this one matters 🚨 if tp is within a module, the caller is responsible for unregistering the probe before the module is gone. like, you gotta clean up your own mess, nobody's coming to save you.

this can be performed either with a tracepoint module going notifier, or from within module exit functions. so two valid ways to do the goodbye β€” pick your vibe 🌈


πŸ’œ SEE ALSO πŸ’œ


okay that's the whole page bestie, every last function reference accounted for, nothing skipped, we ate and left no crumbs πŸ“ this one came out of ./kernel, dated October 2026 β€” so yeah, mark your calendar, future-kernel girlies, and take care of your tracepoints πŸ’–βœ¨πŸŽ€

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from