ubifs_wbuf_seek_nolock(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… ubifs_wbuf_seek_nolock(9) β€” like, the write-buffer seek one ✨

okay bestie so we're in the kernel API manual today, the ubifs_wbuf_seek_nolock(9) page specifically, and honestly? it's a whole little glow-up for your write-buffer. let's get into it πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

ubifs_wbuf_seek_nolock β€” seek write-buffer. that's it, that's the vibe. it moves the write-buffer to where it needs to be, no cap πŸ’…


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

int ubifs_wbuf_seek_nolock (struct ubifs_wbuf *wbuf , int lnum , int
offs );

yes it returns an int, yes it's got three args, yes the line wrap is doing its own thing, we don't judge 🫢


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • wbuf β€” the write-buffer itself, our main character πŸ’–
  • lnum β€” the logical eraseblock number we're seeking to. like the address but make it logical ✨
  • offs β€” the logical eraseblock offset we're seeking to. the little pinch of precision πŸŽ€

πŸ‘‘ DESCRIPTION πŸ‘‘

so what this function does is target the write-buffer at logical eraseblock lnum:offs β€” that's the exact spot, together, lnum colon offs, iconic formatting ngl πŸ’…

🚨 important bestie: the write-buffer has to be empty. not "kinda empty", not "empty-ish". empty. this is not a drill, check your buffer first fr fr 😭

it returns zero in case of success, and a negative error code in case of failure. so like, 0 = slay, anything negative = not slay, go handle it 🌈


πŸ’œ SEE ALSO πŸ’œ

okay this is the part where the friend group shows up and it's a big friend group, so buckle up bestie πŸ“

kernel file ./fs/ubifs/io.c, plus like everyone:

the whole squad, every single one of them, no gatekeeping πŸ’–


🧚 cute little sign-off: this page came to you straight out of ./fs/ubifs, dated October 2026 β€” so go forth, seek that write-buffer, keep it empty, and remember: zero is the success code and it's giving main character energy πŸ’…βœ¨
πŸ“¦ where this page comes from