ubi_write_fastmap(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’Ύ ubi_write_fastmap(9) β€” like, the Kernel API Manual girlies edition πŸŽ€

okay so bestie, gather round, because we're diving into ubi_write_fastmap β€” yes it's from the Kernel API Manual section 9 (kernel internals, iykyk) and yes it does exactly what it says on the tin: it writes a fastmap. that's the whole vibe. let's get into it πŸ’…


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

int ubi_write_fastmap (struct ubi_device *ubi , struct
       ubi_fastmap_layout *new_fm );

literally the whole signature, no notes, copy it exactly, don't @ me 🫢


🌸 ARGUMENTS 🌸

  • ubi β€” the UBI device object itself. like, the main character of this whole operation πŸ’–
  • new_fm β€” the fastmap that's to be written. it hasn't been written yet, it's about to be, it's giving anticipation ✨

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

so here's the tea, and it's a short one for once:

  • Returns 0 on success β€” slay, we love a clean win πŸ‘‘
  • Returns < 0 β€” which indicates an internal error. not a vibe. something went sideways inside the kernel and you're getting a negative number instead of that sweet, sweet zero 😭

that's genuinely it. no cap, no extra lore, that's the whole description. an icon of brevity fr fr.


🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

bestie, the cross-references are thorough, so buckle up β€” this all lives in the kernel file ./drivers/mtd/ubi/fastmap.c:

the way this list just keeps going β€” obsessed with the completeness honestly 🌸 go read them, they're all connected, it's a whole ecosystem πŸ’œ


ngl if you get a negative return you should go poke at the internals, because < 0 means an internal error and that's your cue to investigate πŸ”₯

and that's the page, bestie! 🧚 this little number lives over in ./drivers/mtd/ubi, dated October 2026, and it's filed under ubi_write_fastmap(9) β€” that's the version-and-source sign-off, cute right? mwah πŸ’‹

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from