ubi_dbg_is_read_failure(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… ubi_dbg_is_read_failure(9) β€” the kernel API manual bestie

okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual entry for ubi_dbg_is_read_failure. no cap, this one's a little debug-flavored gem and you're gonna get it instantly. ✨


πŸŽ€ NAME πŸŽ€

ubi_dbg_is_read_failure β€” asks the universe: is it time to emulate a read failure? πŸ‘€


⭐ SYNOPSIS ⭐

bool ubi_dbg_is_read_failure (const struct ubi_device *ubi , unsigned
int caller );

literally the whole signature right there, character for character, don't @ me. 🫢


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • ubi β€” the UBI device description object. this is the main character of the whole situation. πŸ‘‘
  • caller β€” -- undescribed --. yeah. the original manpage just did not say. it's giving mystery, it's giving "you'll find out," and honestly? iconic. πŸ™ˆ

🌸 DESCRIPTION 🌸

so here's the vibe check: this function returns true if a read failure should be emulated. otherwise it returns false. periodt. that's the whole job, and it does it flawlessly. πŸ’…

no extra lore, no plot twists β€” if you were hoping for a third option, sorry bestie, it's a bool, there's only the two. 😭


πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

the kernel file in question is ./drivers/mtd/ubi/debug.h β€” go look, iykyk. πŸ‘‘

and these sibling functions, all fr fr part of the same debug friend group:

one big chaotic group chat, honestly. 🌈


πŸ“ tiny reminder bestie: this is debug territory β€” emulated failures are on purpose, so don't panic when they show up.

okay that's the page!! mwah!! πŸ’–

sourced straight from ./drivers/mtd/ubi, dated October 2026 β€” that's the version and the date, and now you know, bestie. go forth and emulate responsibly. πŸ§šπŸ’œ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from