typec_cable_is_active(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ¦‹ typec_cable_is_active β€” bestie's guide (section 9, kernel API manual)

okay so this is the typec_cable_is_active(9) page, and honestly? it's a short one. a little snack. a single-question quiz about your USB Type-C cable. let's get into it πŸ’…


✨ NAME ✨

typec_cable_is_active β€” check is the USB Type-C cable active or passive

(yes, the original grammar said "check is" and I'm keeping it, it's giving quirky and we love her for it πŸŽ€)


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

int typec_cable_is_active (struct typec_cable *cable );

one function, one argument, returns an int. lowkey elegant. no cap.


🫢 ARGUMENTS 🫢

  • cable β€” The USB Type-C Cable. that's it. that's the whole argument. hand her your cable struct and she'll tell you what's up ✨

πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

Return 1 if the cable is active or 0 if it's passive.

that's genuinely the entire description, bestie. one sentence. icon behavior. you pass in the cable, she gives you back a 1 (active πŸ’…) or a 0 (passive πŸ“). no in-between, no maybe, no "it's complicated." a binary vibe check and she ate.

ngl if you're expecting more lore here, there isn't any β€” this page is short and she knows it. respect the minimalism πŸ”₯

πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

okay this is where it gets unhinged. the see-also list is a whole group chat β€” the kernel file ./drivers/usb/typec/class.c and then every single one of these besties:

like I said. a whole group chat. go say hi to all of them 🧚


πŸ‘‘ sign-off πŸ‘‘

this lil masterpiece lives in the kernel source tree at ./drivers/usb/typec, dated October 2026, and she's page typec_cable_is_active(9) of the Kernel API Manual. stan her, cite her, and remember: active = 1, passive = 0, periodt πŸ’œπŸŒˆβ­

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from