ttm_bo_wait_ctx(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… ttm_bo_wait_ctx(9) β€” like, the Kernel API Manual page you actually wanna read πŸŽ€

okay so bestie, welcome to the <pink>Kernel API Manual</pink> entry for ttm_bo_wait_ctx ✨ it's short, it's sweet, it's giving "tiny function, very important job" energy, and we're gonna get through it together 🫢


✨ NAME ✨

ttm_bo_wait_ctx β€” wait for buffer idle πŸ’€

like literally that's the whole gig. you show up, you wait for the buffer to chill out, you leave 😌


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

int ttm_bo_wait_ctx (struct ttm_buffer_object *bo , struct
       ttm_operation_ctx *ctx );

it returns an int, it takes two pointers, and no we are not scared of it πŸ’…


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • bo β€” the buffer object 🧸 like, the actual thing you're waiting on. this is the main character of the call, ngl.
  • ctx β€” defines how to wait ⏳ it's the vibe-setter! it's the one that decides the rules of the waiting situation. iykyk.

πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

so what does it do? it waits for the buffer to be idle. that's it. that's the function. iconic behaviour honestly πŸ‘‘

but here's the cute lil twist: the used timeout depends on the context β€” so the ctx you pass in literally controls how long this whole waiting saga goes on for. no cap, it's context-dependent, so don't come for me about the timeout length, go ask your ctx πŸ’€

and the return values? let's get into them:

  • returns -EBUSY if the wait timed out β€” and yes the original page says "timed outt" with two t's, and honestly? we're keeping that, it's a whole mood 😭 (technical meaning unaffected: the wait timed out, that's a real failure case, bestie)
  • returns -ERESTARTSYS if it got interrupted by a signal πŸ“΄ like, someone knocked, the wait had to bail
  • returns zero on success βœ… slay!! we love a clean zero
⚠️ heads up: those first two are error returns, not "oopsie we'll retry" β€” -EBUSY means timed out and -ERESTARTSYS means a signal interrupted it. treat them accordingly, fr fr πŸ™ˆ

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

Kernel file ./drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c β€” plus the whole friend group, because this function does not exist in isolation bestie, look at this roster πŸ”₯

go read them. or don't. but they're there πŸ’œ


πŸŽ€ the sign-off πŸŽ€

this lil masterpiece lives in ./drivers/gpu/drm/ttm, dated October 2026, and it answers to the name ttm_bo_wait_ctx(9) ⭐

okay bye bestie, go wait on that buffer, you've got this πŸ§šπŸ’–

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from