try_to_unlazy_next(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

✨ try_to_unlazy_next ✨

okay so bestie, this is a page from the Kernel API Manual β€” yeah, the Kernel API Manual β€” and the star of the show is try_to_unlazy_next(9). buckle up πŸŽ€


🌸 NAME 🌸

try_to_unlazy_next β€” the "try to switch to ref-walk mode" girlie πŸ’…


πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

bool try_to_unlazy_next (struct nameidata *nd , struct dentry *dentry );

πŸ“ ARGUMENTS πŸ“

  • nd β€” the nameidata pathwalk data. it's the walk state, it holds everything, be nice to it 🫢
  • dentry β€” the next dentry to step into. like, the next one, yk? the one you're about to hop into ✨

πŸ”₯ RETURN πŸ”₯

  • true on success πŸ‘‘
  • false on failure 😭

that's it. that's the whole return contract. no cap.


πŸ’œ DESCRIPTION πŸ’œ

so it's similar to try_to_unlazy, right β€” except here we've already got the next dentry picked out by rcu-walk, and we want to legitimize that one in addition to the current nd->path and nd->root for ref-walk mode. the way it's doing double duty… iconic honestly πŸŽ€

⚠️ it must be called from rcu-walk context. not optional, not a vibe suggestion, fr fr.
πŸ™ˆ and β€” huge one β€” nothing should touch nameidata between try_to_unlazy_next failure and terminate_walk. like, hands off. do not pass go, do not touch nameidata, wait for terminate_walk. that window is not for you bestie πŸ’€

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

Kernel file ./fs/namei.c β€” and honestly the whole friend group is here, so let me introduce you πŸ’–

like I said. the whole friend group. iykyk 🌟


mwah, that's the page!! this little number lives in the ./fs source, and it's dated October 2026 β€” so go forth, switch to ref-walk mode responsibly, and remember: no touching nameidata in the timeout corner πŸ§šπŸ’œ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from