transport_remove_device(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… transport_remove_device β€” the "you're off the sysfs grid, bestie" call

Okay so real talk, this page is from the Kernel API Manual and it's all about transport_remove_device. Buckle up, it's short but it matters. πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

transport_remove_device β€” literally just removes the visibility of a device. That's it. That's the whole vibe. πŸ‘»


πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

void transport_remove_device (struct device *dev );

🌸 ARGUMENTS 🌸

  • dev β€” the generic device you're yeeting out of sight. Just a plain old device pointer, no drama. 🫢

πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

So here's the tea, bestie: this call removes the visibility of the device β€” meaning the user can't see it in sysfs anymore β€” but it does not destroy it. Not even a little. The device is still very much alive, just hidden. Like when you set your Insta to private. πŸ•΅οΈβ€β™€οΈ

⚠️ Heads up: if you actually want to eliminate a device entirely, you also gotta call transport_destroy_device. Removing visibility alone is not enough, no cap. πŸ’€

And if you don't need to do remove and destroy as two separate lil operations? Then just use transport_unregister_device (it lives in transport_class.h, iykyk) β€” that icon does both calls for you in one go. Slay. πŸ‘‘


πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

First off, the kernel file itself:

  • Kernel file ./drivers/base/transport_class.c

And the whole friend group of related calls:


Okay that's the whole page, bestie β€” go forth and un-register responsibly. πŸ’œ

This one comes from ./drivers/base in the Kernel API Manual, dated October 2026, and it's the transport_remove_device(9) page, if you even care. Mwah. πŸ’‹

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from