tracer_tracing_is_on(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… tracer_tracing_is_on β€” a.k.a. the "is my ring buffer actually on tho" check πŸŽ€

okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual page for tracer_tracing_is_on(9) β€” yes that (9) means it's a kernel thing, iykyk. Settle in, this one's short and sweet and honestly kind of iconic for it. ✨


🌸 NAME 🌸

tracer_tracing_is_on β€” shows the real state of whether the ring buffer is enabled or not. no vibes, no guessing, just the truth. πŸ’―


πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

bool tracer_tracing_is_on (struct trace_array *tr );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • tr β€” the trace array you're passing in so it can tell you whether that ring buffer is enabled. like, "hey, is this one on?" and it answers. πŸ’–

✨ DESCRIPTION ✨

Shows the real state of the ring buffer β€” enabled, or not. that's it. that's the whole function. it's giving "short queen, no notes" and honestly we respect it. πŸ‘‘

the point is the real part, okay? it's not out here doing a vibe check on a cached little flag or whatever β€” it's showing you the actual state of the ring buffer itself. trust. 🫢


πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

the whole friend group, fr fr β€” go say hi to all of them:


πŸ’€ quick reminder that tracer_tracing_is_on(9) is literally the sibling of tracer_tracing_enable(9) and tracer_tracing_disable(9) β€” so if you're toggling the thing, come back here to double-check it actually took. 😭

and that's the page!! no cap, you're now certified in knowing whether your ring buffer is on. go be the main character of your own trace session. πŸŒˆπŸ¦‹πŸ’œ

sign-off szn πŸŽ€ β€” this page lives in ./kernel/trace, dated October 2026, and it's the tracer_tracing_is_on(9) page from the Kernel API Manual. mwah, study safe, bestie βœ¨πŸ’…

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from