tpm_chip_alloc(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

🌸 tpm_chip_alloc(9) 🌸

okay so this is from the Kernel API Manual, and bestie, it's literally about giving birth to a struct tpm_chip πŸ’– it's short, it's sweet, it's giving "small but mighty" energy, let's go ✨


πŸ’« NAME πŸ’«

tpm_chip_alloc β€” allocate a new struct tpm_chip instance 🫢

like, you're manifesting a whole chip object into existence. main character behavior fr fr πŸ‘‘


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

struct tpm_chip * tpm_chip_alloc (struct device *pdev , const struct tpm_class_ops *ops );

two args, one return, zero drama. slay πŸ’…


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • pdev β€” the device your chip is getting associated with πŸ’ž no cap, at this point pdev mst be initialized already, but it does not have to be registered yet. (yes the manpage literally says mst instead of must β€” typo era, we love her anyway πŸ™ˆ the meaning is "must", don't come for me)
  • ops β€” your struct tpm_class_ops instance. that's it. that's the whole vibe check πŸ¦‹

🌈 DESCRIPTION 🌈

so what actually happens? tpm_chip_alloc allocates a brand new struct tpm_chip instance and assigns it a free device number for it ✨ iconic, honestly.

and here's the part you CANNOT skip: it must be paired with put_device(chip->dev).

⚠️ bestie I'm so serious β€” if you alloc and don't put_device(chip->dev), that's a leak, that's not the vibe, that's a red flag 🚩 pair them up like matching friendship bracelets or it's over 😭

πŸ‘‘ SEE ALSO πŸ‘‘

kernel file ./drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c β€” go read the source, iykyk πŸ“–

and the whole friend group:


okay that's the whole page, you ate that πŸ“πŸ’œ this one lives in ./drivers/char/tpm, dated October 2026, and the page itself is tpm_chip_alloc(9) β€” mwah, go forth and free your devices, bestie πŸ§šβ€β™€οΈπŸŽ€βœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from