ti_sci_inta_unmask_irq(9)

📦 version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

💅 ti_sci_inta_unmask_irq — bestie's guide to letting the interrupts back in

okay so this is a page from the Kernel API Manual (yes, the Kernel API Manual, we're in the big leagues now ✨), and it's all about ti_sci_inta_unmask_irq, which does exactly what it says on the tin 🎀

✨ NAME ✨

ti_sci_inta_unmask_irq — unmask an event 💖

that's it. that's the whole vibe. one job, does it, slays.

🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void ti_sci_inta_unmask_irq (struct irq_data *data );

returns void, so like… no return value, no drama, no "did it work?" text back. it just goes 💫

🦋 ARGUMENTS 🦋

  • data — pointer to the corresponding irq_data. that's your one and only input, bestie. a lil pointer, minding its own business, pointing at the irq_data for this interrupt 🫶
ngl, this function is not chatty. one argument, no return, no errors listed. it's giving "minimalist icon" 💅

🎀 SEE ALSO 🎀

okay this is where it gets good, because the whole friend group is here 🔥 the kernel file is ./drivers/irqchip/irq-ti-sci-inta.c, and these are the structs and functions living their best lives in it:

like, yes, that's a lot of names, but they're all literally listed in the original and i'm not about to ghost any of them 😭 especially ti_sci_inta_mask_irq(9) and ti_sci_inta_unmask_irq(9) — they're literally the masked/unmasked duo, the main character energy of this whole family 🌈

quick vibe check: the manpage itself doesn't promise any error behaviour, return codes, or side effects beyond "unmask an event", so don't be out here imagining more than that, fr fr 🙈

that's the whole page, bestie — short, sweet, and iconic 👑 this one came out of the ./drivers/irqchip corner of the tree, dated October 2026, and honestly? she ate 💅💖✨

📦 where this page comes from