ti_msgmgr_queue_rx_irq_req(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’– ti_msgmgr_queue_rx_irq_req β€” NAME πŸ’–

okay so bestie, this is ti_msgmgr_queue_rx_irq_req(9) from the Kernel API Manual, and its whole personality is literally "RX IRQ request" ✨ like that's the name, that's the vibe, that's the job πŸŽ€


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

int ti_msgmgr_queue_rx_irq_req (struct device *dev , const struct
ti_msgmgr_desc *d , struct ti_queue_inst *qinst , struct mbox_chan *chan
);

it returns an int, it takes four args, and honestly? it ate πŸ’… no cap, that signature is doing exactly what it needs to do 🫢


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • dev β€” device pointer πŸ‘‘ like the actual device we're doing all this for, main character energy fr
  • d β€” descriptor for ti_msgmgr πŸ“‹ the lil info card that tells you everything about the msgmgr
  • qinst β€” Queue instance πŸŽ€ the queue we're talking about, the one and only
  • chan β€” Channel pointer πŸ“¬ the mailbox channel, handin' off the messages iykyk

⭐ SEE ALSO ⭐

so like, the source of truth is the kernel file ./drivers/mailbox/ti-msgmgr.c and also the struct β€” go read 'em, they're iconic 🌈

and then there's the whole friend group, all these (9) guys, go say hi to all of them bestie πŸ’œ


πŸ’€ quick vibe check: this page literally only gives you dev, d, qinst, chan and a bunch of cross-references β€” no behavior details, no return-value lore, no caveats. so don't go inventing any, mkay? πŸ™ˆ

and that's the whole page, bestie πŸ“ it lives over in ./drivers/mailbox, dated October 2026, and it's signed off as ti_msgmgr_queue_rx_irq_req(9) β€” mwah, slay, periodt πŸ’–πŸ§šβ€β™€οΈβœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from