ti_cpufreq_get_rev(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… ti_cpufreq_get_rev(9) β€” like, the whole entire manual page, bestie

okay so this is a page straight outta the Kernel API Manual, and it's about ti_cpufreq_get_rev(9). yes the function name is literally the same as the page name, that's just how kernel docs roll, we don't question it πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

ti_cpufreq_get_rev β€” parses the rev value that's present on the SoC and hands it back to you. that's it, that's the whole job. iconic behaviour honestly πŸ‘‘


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

int ti_cpufreq_get_rev (struct ti_cpufreq_data *opp_data , u32
*revision_value );

look at her. returns an int, takes a struct ti_cpufreq_data * and a u32 *. she's giving very much "small function, big responsibility" πŸ’–


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • opp_data β€” pointer to the ti_cpufreq_data context. like, the whole vibe of the thing, passed in by reference 🫢
  • revision_value β€” gets set to the value parsed from the revision register. so it's an out-param, she writes into it, you read from it, teamwork fr fr ✨

πŸ’€ DESCRIPTION πŸ’€

so basically: if the revision doesn't get read properly, this function returns an error code. that's the whole description. no cap. short and honest 😭

lowkey a warning-ish vibe: the error case is real, so check that return value, bestie. don't just ignore it and act surprised later πŸ™ˆ

πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

  • kernel file ./drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
  • ti_cpufreq_get_efuse(9) β€” her sister function, go say hi πŸ’œ

and that's the page!! πŸŽ€ ok so the sign-off: this lil doc lives under the source path ./drivers/cpufreq, dated October 2026, and it's literally named ti_cpufreq_get_rev(9) β€” so yeah, slay, go read your revision registers responsibly, mwah πŸ’…πŸŒˆβ­

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from