teedev_ctx_get(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

✨ teedev_ctx_get(9) ✨

okay bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual β€” yes we're reading kernel docs together, this is our hangout now πŸ’… this one's teedev_ctx_get(9) and it's literally a one-line function that does One Job and honestly? icon behavior.


🌸 NAME 🌸

teedev_ctx_get β€” bump up the reference count on a context, that's it, that's the whole gig πŸŽ€


πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

void teedev_ctx_get (struct tee_context *ctx );

πŸ’– ARGUMENTS πŸ’–

  • ctx β€” a pointer to the context. like, the context itself, not a copy, not a vibe, the actual pointer 🫢

πŸ”₯ DESCRIPTION πŸ”₯

So what's actually happening here: this function increases the refcount of the context. And that context is tied to resources that get shared by the same tee_device β€” so it's all one big friend group, yk? πŸ‘‘

Now here's the part that matters, bestie, pay attention: during the unregistration process, the context may stay valid even after tee_device_unregister has already returned. Yeah. It outlives it. main character energy honestly 😭

So what are you supposed to do? You gotta make sure the context's refcount is properly decreased before you call tee_device_put β€” typically that happens inside the context's release function, which is exactly where it belongs πŸŽ€

OR, alternative route: users can call tee_device_get and teedev_ctx_get together, then release them simultaneously. (peep shm_alloc_helper for the example, iykyk ⭐)


🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

the whole extended universe, no cap β€” kernel file ./include/linux/tee_core.h plus:


⚠️ real talk: forget to drop that refcount before tee_device_put and you're gonna have a bad time. this is not a drill, bestie πŸ’€

and that's the whole page!! sourced from ./include/linux, dated October 2026, filed under teedev_ctx_get(9) β€” mwah, go refcount responsibly πŸ§šπŸ’œ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from