tcf_em_unregister(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

✨ tcf_em_unregister(9) ✨

okay so bestie, we're in the Kernel API Manual today and this one's a lil goodbye note 🫢 it lives in tcf_em_unregister(9) land and it's short, sweet, and honestly kinda emotional.


πŸ’… NAME πŸ’…

tcf_em_unregister β€” unregister and extended match

(yes that's the exact wording, no I'm not fixing it, it's iconic as-is πŸ‘‘)


πŸŽ€ SYNOPSIS πŸŽ€

void tcf_em_unregister (struct tcf_ematch_ops *ops );

🌸 ARGUMENTS 🌸

  • ops β€” the ematch operations lookup table, aka the whole personality of the ematch you're saying bye to 🌈

πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

okay so here's the vibe: this function must be called by ematches to announce their disappearance, like when the module gets unloaded πŸ‘‹ it's the "i'm leaving the group chat" of kernel functions fr fr.

the ops parameter must be the same as the one used for registration β€” no swapping it out for a lookalike, bestie, it's gotta be the exact same one πŸ’€

Returns -ENOENT if no matching ematch was found 😭 so if you get that back, your ematch wasn't even there to begin with, awkward.

ngl this is a small function but skipping it is not the move β€” ematches need their little farewell moment or things get messy πŸ™ˆ

πŸ¦‹ SEE ALSO πŸ¦‹


and that's the whole page, bestie, slay ✨ this one came straight out of ./net/sched and it's dated October 2026 β€” signed, sealed, tcf_em_unregister(9), periodt πŸ’…πŸ’œ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from