tcf_csum_skb_nextlayer(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’– tcf_csum_skb_nextlayer(9) β€” like, the "get next layer pointer" moment πŸ’–

okay bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual ✨ this one lives in section 9 and it's all about tcf_csum_skb_nextlayer β€” yes that's a mouthful, we're gonna say it together and slay it 🫢


✨ NAME ✨

tcf_csum_skb_nextlayer β€” get next layer pointer 🌸 lowkey does exactly what it says on the tin.


πŸŽ€ SYNOPSIS πŸŽ€

void * tcf_csum_skb_nextlayer (struct sk_buff *skb , unsigned int ihl ,
       unsigned int ipl , unsigned int jhl );

that's the whole vibe check: it hands you back a void * πŸ’…


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • skb β€” the sk_buff you're working with, bestie. the packet vessel fr fr πŸ“
  • ihl β€” previous summed headers length. that's how much header we already added up πŸ‘‘
  • ipl β€” complete packet length. the whole thing, not just a lil piece 🌈
  • jhl β€” next header length. the one we're peeking at next πŸ‘€

πŸ”₯ DESCRIPTION πŸ”₯

so the actual job: it checks whether the expected next layer is even available inside the sk_buff you passed in. vibe check on the packet's next layer, basically ✨

if it passes, you get the next layer pointer back 🫢 if it doesn't pass, you get NULL β€” that's it, that's the whole story 😭 no cap.


πŸ’œ SEE ALSO πŸ’œ

  • Kernel file ./net/sched/act_csum.c β€” go read the source, iykyk πŸ“–

ngl this function is short but it eats πŸ’€ don't forget the NULL case, it's giving main character energy and it WILL show up.

that's the page bestie! 🧚 from <hotpink>./net/sched</hotpink>, in the Kernel API Manual, dated October 2026 β€” mwah, go check your next layer pointers, ily, periodt πŸ’…πŸ’–

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from