tb_ring_start(9)

💅 tb_ring_start(9) — from the Kernel API Manual, bestie

Okay so picture this: it's giving "one little function, one big responsibility." We're in tb_ring_start(9) territory, straight outta the Kernel API Manual, and honestly? It's a short read but the vibe check is immaculate. Let's get into it ✨

---

🌸 NAME

tb_ring_start — literally just enable a ring. That's it. That's the whole job. Slay.

---

🎀 SYNOPSIS

void tb_ring_start (struct tb_ring *ring );

Look at that signature. Clean. No return value. Very "I do my thing and I leave" energy 💅

---

🦋 ARGUMENTS

• ring — the ring you wanna start, bestie. That's the one. Hand it over and let it cook 🔥

---

⭐ DESCRIPTION

So here's the tea: you call this bad boy to enable a ring, and it does exactly that. But — and this is the important part, so listen up — it must not be invoked in parallel with tb_ring_stop. Like, at all. Not even a little. Fr fr, they do not vibe together at the same time 🙈

No cap, that's a real constraint — no parallel calls with tb_ring_stop, periodt. Keep your starts and your stops from overlapping or things get ✨undefined-vibes✨ in the worst way 😭

---

👑 SEE ALSO

Go touch some other manpages, bestie — they're all right here:

• Kernel file ./drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.c
• tb_ring_poll(9)
• tb_ring_poll_complete(9)
• tb_ring_alloc_tx(9)
• tb_ring_alloc_rx(9)
• tb_ring_flush(9)
• tb_ring_stop(9)
• tb_ring_throttling(9)
• nhi_mailbox_cmd(9)
• nhi_mailbox_mode(9)

---

That's the whole page, babes — short king behavior, honestly 💜

And before you go, a lil sign-off: this one lives in ./drivers/thunderbolt, dated October 2026, and it's tb_ring_start(9) through and through. Now go enable that ring responsibly, mwah 🫶🌈