sysfs_bin_attr_init(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

✨ sysfs_bin_attr_init(9) ✨

okay bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual πŸ’– this one's a lil cutie from the sysfs corner of the kernel, so grab ur matcha and let's go πŸ“


🌸 NAME 🌸

sysfs_bin_attr_init β€” it literally initializes a dynamically allocated bin_attribute πŸ‘‘ that's it, that's the whole job, and she does it well periodt


πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

sysfs_bin_attr_init (bin_attr );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • bin_attr β€” ngl the original docs just say -- undescribed -- 😭 so like... it's the bin_attribute you're initializing, obviously, but the manpage itself gives us nothing more than that. no cap, that's all she wrote πŸ’€

πŸ’… DESCRIPTION πŸ’…

so basically you call sysfs_bin_attr_init to initialize a dynamically allocated struct bin_attribute β€” and the whole reason it exists is to make lockdep happy 🫢 like, lockdep is that friend who needs everything just so, and this function is how you keep her chill.

this is a new requirement for attributes, okay? and initially it's only needed when lockdep is enabled πŸ”₯

and here's the tea: if you don't have this, lockdep will give you a nice error when your attribute gets added to sysfs 😭 so like... do the thing, bestie. call the function. keep lockdep happy. it's giving self-care honestly ✨

🫢 friendly reminder that this is a requirement now β€” skipping it is how you end up with a lockdep complaint on your timeline and nobody wants that πŸ™ˆ

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈


⭐ the sign-off ⭐

this lil gem lives under ./include/linux and the version tag on it is October 2026 πŸ—“οΈ and yes the header/footer both say sysfs_bin_attr_init(9) because consistency is iconic πŸ’œ

go forth and initialize ur bin_attributes, bestie β€” lockdep believes in you πŸ’…βœ¨πŸ§š

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from