synth_event_add_field(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… synth_event_add_field(9) πŸ’…

okay so this is a page from the Kernel API Manual, and bestie, we're about to add a field to a synthetic event cmd. slay. let's get into it 🫢


✨ NAME ✨

synth_event_add_field β€” adds a shiny new field to a synthetic event cmd 🌸

✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

int synth_event_add_field (struct dynevent_cmd *cmd , const char *type ,
       const char *name );

✨ ARGUMENTS ✨

  • cmd β€” a pointer to the dynevent_cmd struct that's representing the new event. like, this is the whole vibe container πŸ’œ
  • type β€” the type of the new field you're adding. yep, that's the one.
  • name β€” the name of the new field you're adding. iconic of it.

✨ DESCRIPTION ✨

so basically you're adding a new field to a synthetic event cmd object. and here's the cute part: field ordering is in the same order the fields are added. so like, first in, first listed. no cap, order matters πŸŽ€

also, go check out synth_field_size for the available types β€” that's where the type menu lives, iykyk. and heads up: if field_name contains [n], the field is considered to be an array. literally that's it, that's the rule ✨

✨ RETURN ✨

0 if successful, error otherwise. that's the whole thing. zero means we ate, anything else means something's off 😭

✨ SEE ALSO ✨


bestie the whole friend group is in SEE ALSO. go read them. it's giving study group energy πŸ“šπŸ’…

and that's the page!! this one lives over in ./kernel/trace and it's dated October 2026 β€” so like, future-era kernel lore ⭐ thanks for reading, mwah πŸ’–πŸ¦‹

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from