softleaf_is_uffd_wp_marker(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… softleaf_is_uffd_wp_marker(9) β€” a Kernel API Manual moment

ok so bestie, we're in the Kernel API Manual today and the star of the show is softleaf_is_uffd_wp_marker(9). yes that's a long name. yes it's iconic. let's get into it 🫢


✨ NAME ✨

softleaf_is_uffd_wp_marker β€” basically the vibes check that answers: is this leaf entry a userfaultfd write protect marker? πŸŽ€

🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

bool softleaf_is_uffd_wp_marker (softleaf_t entry );

πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • entry β€” the leaf entry in question. that's it. that's the whole argument. lowkey a minimalist queen πŸ’…

🧚 DESCRIPTION 🧚

This one is userfaultfd-specific. like, that's the entire description, no cap. it does not elaborate, it does not explain further, it said what it said and it ate πŸ’€

⭐ RETURN ⭐

  • true β€” if the leaf entry is a UFFD WP marker ✨
  • false β€” otherwise πŸ™ˆ

that's the whole binary, bestie. no in-between, no "maybe", no "it depends". main character energy fr fr.


πŸ‘‘ SEE ALSO πŸ‘‘

ok this is the part where the page goes absolutely feral with cross-references, so buckle up. also heads up, the kernel file lives at ./include/linux/leafops.h πŸ“

like, every single one. we don't skip. we don't summarise. we list all thirty-four of them and we slay while doing it 🌈


ngl if you actually read this entire SEE ALSO list you have my genuine respect, that's dedication πŸ“

ok that's the page!! this one came from ./include/linux, and the dated vibe check says October 2026 ✨ go off, leafops πŸ’œ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from