snd_soc_comp...t_read_field(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… snd_soc_comp...t_read_field(9) β€” like, the Kernel API Manual page, bestie ✨

Okay so you found your way into the kernel docs, and this one lives in the Kernel API Manual. Buckle up, it's a short one but it slaps.


🌸 NAME 🌸

snd_soc_component_read_field β€” literally reads a register field value for you. That's the whole job. Iconic, honestly.


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

unsigned int snd_soc_component_read_field (struct snd_soc_component
*component , unsigned int reg , unsigned int mask );

Note the return type, bestie: unsigned int. Not int, not void, unsigned int. The way that matters 🫢


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • component β€” the component you're reading from πŸ’– like, which chip are we snooping on
  • reg β€” the register you wanna read. the address. the location πŸ‘‘
  • mask β€” the mask of the register field. this is the "which bits do I actually care about" vibe check πŸ”₯

πŸ¦‹ RETURN πŸ¦‹

It gives you back the read value of the register field. That's it. That's the tea. ⭐


🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

Bestie, go read the actual source first: ./sound/soc/soc-component.c β€” that's where the magic happens, no cap.

And then the whole friend group of related calls, all of them, in order, because I would never leave one out:


Lowkey the whole read_field / write_field duo is giving main character energy in soc-component.c. Go look at them together. Iykyk πŸ’…

Sign-off time, bestie 🧚 this page ships out of ./sound/soc, dated October 2026, and it's page snd_soc_comp...t_read_field(9) of the Kernel API Manual. Mwah. πŸ’œπŸŽ€πŸ“

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from