smp_mb__afte..._read_unlock(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… smp_mb__after_srcu_read_unlock(9) β€” NAME πŸ’…

okay so bestie, this is the page for smp_mb__after_srcu_read_unlock β€” and yes, it lives in the Kernel API Manual (the header up top literally gets cut off to smp_mb__afte..._read_unlock(9) because the terminal ran out of room 😭 icon behaviour honestly).

What does it do? It ensures full ordering after srcu_read_unlock. That's the whole vibe check. πŸŽ€


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

void smp_mb__after_srcu_read_unlock (void );

🫢 ARGUMENTS 🫢

  • void β€” no arguments. none. zero. it takes nothing. it just shows up, does the barrier, and leaves πŸ‘‘

🌸 DESCRIPTION 🌸

So here's the tea β˜•: this function converts the preceding srcu_read_unlock into a two-way memory barrier. That's it. That's the whole function. Lowkey iconic.

Call this after srcu_read_unlock, and it guarantees that all memory operations that occur after smp_mb__after_srcu_read_unlock will appear to happen after the preceding srcu_read_unlock. Like, the CPU is not gonna reorder your stuff behind your back, periodt πŸ’€βœ¨

ordering flirting: the unlock comes first, the barrier makes sure nobody sneaks past it β€” the memory ordering is literally not beating the allegations πŸ¦‹

πŸ’œ SEE ALSO πŸ’œ

Kernel file ./include/linux/srcu.h β€” home of all this goodness:

that's the whole friend group right there, go say hi πŸ§šπŸ’–


✨ bye bestie ✨ β€” this page came from the ./include/linux corner of the source tree, dated October 2026, and the footer still spells the name smp_mb__afte..._read_unlock(9) because truncation is forever πŸ™ˆπŸ’… go forth and be memory-ordered πŸŽ€

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from