smp_cond_load_relaxed(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… smp_cond_load_relaxed(9) β€” Kernel API Manual πŸŽ€

okay bestie, so this one's a kernel macro from the Kernel API Manual and it's called smp_cond_load_relaxed β€” yes that's a whole mouthful, we're gonna get through it together 🫢. And ngl, the name is doing exactly what it says on the tin: it (spin) waits for cond, and it gives you no ordering guarantees. Periodt.


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

smp_cond_load_relaxed (ptr , cond_expr );

like, two args, that's it, slay ✨


✨ ARGUMENTS ✨

  • ptr β€” pointer to the variable to wait on. this is your main character, the thing you're staring at πŸ‘€
  • cond_expr β€” boolean expression to wait for. the vibe check you're waiting to pass πŸ’–

πŸ’€ DESCRIPTION πŸ’€

So what does it actually do? It's equivalent to using READ_ONCE on the condition variable β€” that's the whole energy. no cap.

And here's the tea about why it works the way it does: due to C lacking lambda expressions, we can't just hand it a cute little inline function. so instead, it loads the value of *ptr into a pre-named variable VAL which is the thing you get to use in cond. that's it, that's the trick β€” VAL is literally just sitting there pre-named so your condition has something to refer to. iconic workaround, honestly 🧚

⚠️ heads up bestie: the "relaxed" in the name is not a vibe, it's a promise β€” no ordering guarantees. if you needed ordering, you're at the wrong function, iykyk. go look at the acquire one πŸ‘‡

πŸ‘‘ SEE ALSO πŸ‘‘

  • Kernel file: ./include/asm-generic/barrier.h β€” literally the source, go read it πŸ’œ
  • smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep(9) β€” the dependency-ordering bestie 🌈
  • smp_cond_load_acquire(9) β€” same-ish energy, but with acquire ordering, so if you need guarantees, this is your girl ⭐

πŸŽ€ and that's the whole page!! sourced from ./include/asm-generic, dated October 2026, and it's smp_cond_load_relaxed(9) all day babes β€” go wait on a condition, but relaxedly πŸ’…πŸ’–πŸ”₯

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from