sdca_regmap_writeable(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… sdca_regmap_writeable(9)

okay so bestie, welcome to the kernel API manual for sdca_regmap_writeable β€” yes that's the whole name, yes it's a mouthful, no we're not shortening it. this is the little bool-returning icon of ./sound/soc/sdca/sdca_regmap.c and honestly? she's giving "tiny function, big responsibility." ✨


🌸 NAME

sdca_regmap_writeable β€” return if a given SDCA Control is writeable πŸ’…

like, that's it. that's the job. you ask her "hey is this thing writeable?" and she tells you. no cap.


πŸŽ€ SYNOPSIS

bool sdca_regmap_writeable (struct sdca_function_data *function ,
unsigned int reg );

literally the whole signature, copied exactly, do not come for me about the spacing 🫢


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS

  • function β€” Pointer to the Function information. she needs to know which Function we're talking about, so hand her the pointer, bestie πŸ’–
  • reg β€” Register address/Control to be processed. this is the one getting the vibe check πŸ‘‘

⭐ RETURN

Returns true if the register is writeable.

that's it. that's the return value. true means go off, write away. anything else means... not writeable. iconic behavior honestly 🌈


πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO

the whole regmap friend group fr fr β€” go read them too, they're all slaying in their own way πŸ’œ


🫢 friendly reminder: I kept every option and detail exactly as the original had it. no facts were harmed in the making of this group chat.

mwah πŸ’‹ that's the page! sourced from ./sound/soc/sdca, dated October 2026, and yes it's still called sdca_regmap_writeable(9) β€” she said "I'm keeping my name." periodt. πŸŽ€βœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from