sci_apc_agent_link_up(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

okay so bestie, welcome to the kernel API manual, this one's from sci_apc_agent_link_up(9) and it's literally all about handling apc link up events. yes gorl. let's get into it πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

sci_apc_agent_link_up β€” handles apc link up events. that's it, that's the vibe. πŸ‘‘


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void sci_apc_agent_link_up (struct isci_host *ihost , struct
       sci_port_configuration_agent *port_agent , struct isci_port *iport ,
       struct isci_phy *iphy );

no return value, it's giving void, it just does the thing and leaves. main character energy tbh πŸ’…


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • ihost β€” the controller object that receives the link up notification. this is the one getting the news, fr fr.
  • port_agent β€” the port configuration agent for the controller. your girl on the inside handling the config ✨
  • iport β€” the port object associated with the phy. and listen β€” if there's no associated port, this bad boy is a NULL. no port, no problem, but also, mind the gap πŸ™ˆ
  • iphy β€” the phy object which has gone link up. it's up! it's awake! it's serving 🌈

πŸ’œ DESCRIPTION πŸ’œ

so what does this method actually do? it handles the automatic port configuration for link up notifications β€” like, the moment a phy goes link up, this is the lil function that sorts out the port config for you. iconic behaviour honestly 🫢

and then there's the question the docs just leave hanging there, lowkey haunting:

Is it possible to get a link down notification from a phy that has no associated port?

that's the mystery bestie. the manpage really said "you tell me" πŸ’€ no answer given, we just vibe with the uncertainty 😭


🧚 SEE ALSO 🧚

the whole link-up / link-down friend group, obsessed with them honestly 🌸


and that's the whole page bestie!! πŸ’– this gem lives in ./drivers/scsi/isci, it's dated October 2026, and it's filed under sci_apc_agent_link_up(9) β€” slay, go forth and configure those ports πŸ‘‘βœ¨πŸŽ€

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from