scan_for_idx_cb(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… scan_for_idx_cb β€” the Kernel API Manual, bestie edition πŸŽ€

ok so real talk, this is scan_for_idx_cb(9) from the Kernel API Manual, and she's a callback. not just any callback β€” the callback that the scan for a free LEB for the index uses. yes the double "for" is in the original, we don't fix, we stan. πŸ’–


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

int scan_for_idx_cb (struct ubifs_info *c , const struct ubifs_lprops
*lprops , int in_tree , void *arg );

literally the whole signature, character for character, no crumbs left behind. 🫢


🌸 ARGUMENTS 🌸

  • c β€” the UBIFS file-system description object, iconic, does exactly what it says πŸ¦‹
  • lprops β€” the LEB properties we're scanning, like the main character of this whole function ngl
  • in_tree β€” tells you whether the LEB properties are in main memory πŸ‘€
  • arg β€” the info that gets passed to and from the caller of the scan, so it's a two-way situation, lowkey important πŸ’…

πŸ”₯ DESCRIPTION πŸ”₯

ok so here's the vibe: this function returns a code, and that code tells you what the scan should do next. it's giving traffic light energy, three possible exits, no cap:

  1. the scan should continue β€” that's LPT_SCAN_CONTINUE 🌈
  2. the LEB properties should be added to the tree in main memory β€” that's LPT_SCAN_ADD ✨
  3. the scan should stop β€” that's LPT_SCAN_STOP πŸ›‘πŸ’€

that's it, that's the whole job, and honestly? she ate. πŸ‘‘


πŸŽ€ SEE ALSO πŸŽ€

all the besties in the same friend group, fr fr:

every single one, none skipped, we don't do incomplete friend groups here πŸ’œ


little heads up bestie: that SEE ALSO list is the exact list, in the exact order, from the original. don't come for me about the ordering, i don't make the rules, the kernel does. πŸ™ˆ

and that's the tea, bestie πŸ“ β€” this one comes from ./fs/ubifs, dated October 2026, and it's page scan_for_idx_cb(9). mwah, go forth and scan responsibly πŸ’…βœ¨πŸ§š

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from