sata_set_spd_needed(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… sata_set_spd_needed(9) β€” the kernel API manual, but make it make sense

okay so bestie, welcome to sata_set_spd_needed(9) πŸ’– this is one of those little libata helper functions that lives in ./drivers/ata/libata-sata.c, and honestly? she's a vibe check for your SATA link speed config. let's get into it ✨


✨ NAME ✨

sata_set_spd_needed β€” literally just answers "is SATA spd configuration needed" πŸŽ€


πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

int sata_set_spd_needed (struct ata_link *link );

🌸 ARGUMENTS 🌸

  • link β€” the link in question 🫢 like, the actual struct ata_link you're curious about. main character energy, honestly.

πŸ”₯ DESCRIPTION πŸ”₯

so what she does πŸ‘‘ : she tests whether the spd limit sitting in SControl matches link->sata_spd_limit. that's the whole flex.

and why do we care?? because this function is used to determine whether hardreset is necessary to apply SATA spd configuration πŸ’€ like yeah, no cap, sometimes you gotta hardreset the link just to make the new speed setting actually stick. she's the one who tells you if that's the situation.

LOCKING: inherited from caller 😭 she does not take her own locks, bestie β€” that's your job. you brought the locks, you hold the locks, iykyk πŸ”’


⭐ RETURN ⭐

  • 1 β€” yep, SATA spd configuration is needed πŸ”₯
  • 0 β€” nope, you're good, no config needed 🌈

like, it's giving boolean. that's it. that's the whole return value πŸ™ˆ


🧚 SEE ALSO 🧚

the kernel file ./drivers/ata/libata-sata.c says hi, and so do all her friends πŸ’œ:

go read sata_set_spd(9) next if you actually wanna set the thing β€” this page only tells you whether you need to πŸŽ€

and that's the whole page, bestie, we ate and left no crumbs πŸ’… this little drop came out of ./drivers/ata back in October 2026, and it's still out here doing sata_set_spd_needed(9) things. periodt. 🌟

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from