same_state_...ize_rcu_full(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… same_state_synchronize_rcu_full(9) β€” a Kernel API Manual moment

okay so bestie, this page lives in the Kernel API Manual, and it's genuinely one of the shorter ones β€” a little baby function with a whole lot of personality. let's get into it ✨


🌸 NAME

same_state_synchronize_rcu_full β€” are two old-state values, like, identical? are they the same girl? πŸ’…


πŸŽ€ SYNOPSIS

bool same_state_synchronize_rcu_full (struct rcu_gp_seq *rgosp1 , struct
       rcu_gp_seq *rgosp2 );

it hands you back a bool, bestie. true or false, that's the whole vibe check πŸ”₯


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS

  • rgosp1 β€” the first old-state value. the one you're holding up next to the other one 🫢
  • rgosp2 β€” the second old-state value. the other half of the comparison, no cap πŸ’–

✨ DESCRIPTION

okay so listen. the two old-state values you're passing in must have come from one of these three places, periodt:

  • get_state_synchronize_rcu_full
  • start_poll_synchronize_rcu_full
  • get_completed_synchronize_rcu_full

like, that's the whole sourcing requirement, don't be out here making up your own old-state values πŸ™ˆ

so what does it do? it returns true if the two values are identical, and false otherwise. that's it. that's the function. iconic behaviour honestly πŸ‘‘

and why do you care? because this lets structures whose lifetimes are tracked by old-state values push those values up to a list header β€” which means those structures can be slightly smaller. little size win, big main-character energy. we love a memory optimization 🌈

⚠️ important vibe check, do not skip this one: equality here is judged on a bitwise basis. so an rcu_gp_seq structure with an already-completed state in one field will compare not-equal to a structure with an already-completed state in the other field. like, yes, they're both "completed," but bitwise be like that sometimes 😭

and honestly, as the page itself points out β€” after all, the rcu_gp_seq structure is opaque, so how did such a situation come to pass in the first place? πŸ’€ that's the real question. no notes. flawless. keep that in mind fr fr πŸ“


πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO

  • Kernel file ./include/linux/rcutree.h β€” go read it, iykyk 🧚

πŸ’œ a lil sign-off, bestie

that's the whole page! it came from ./include/linux and it's dated October 2026 β€” so mark your calendar, screenshot it, send it to the group chat, whatever feels right. you understood it, you slayed it, periodt. πŸŽ€βœ¨πŸŒΈ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from