rv_register_reactor(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… rv_register_reactor(9) β€” from the Kernel API Manual, bestie πŸŽ€

okay so like. picture this: it's giving kernel-internals era, and you've got a reactor that needs to be seen. this page is literally the glow-up ceremony for it ✨ (rv_register_reactor(9), if we're being formal β€” and we are, this is the Kernel API Manual, we have standards 🫢).


✨ NAME ✨

rv_register_reactor β€” register a rv reactor. that's it. that's the whole vibe. πŸ”₯


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

int rv_register_reactor (struct rv_reactor *reactor );

literally one function, one pointer, one int coming back atcha. clean. iconic. no notes. πŸ‘‘


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • reactor β€” the rv_reactor to be registered. yes bestie, this is the one getting its moment. hand it over and let the kernel do its thing πŸ’œ

πŸŽ€ DESCRIPTION πŸŽ€

Returns 0 if successful, error otherwise.

that's the whole story ngl β€” 0 means slay, anything else means something went sideways and you should probably look into it 😭. no cap, that's the entire contract.


🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

iykyk, go read 'em all β€” the whole reactor friend group is tagged in this thing 🧚


fr fr: everything above is the source of truth, so don't go inventing extra behavior in your head. 0 = good, error = not good, and the reactor argument is the rv_reactor to be registered. periodt πŸ’…

and that's the page, bestie!! πŸ’– source says ./kernel/trace/rv, dated October 2026, and it's filed under rv_register_reactor(9) because main character energy always gets top billing β­πŸ“ see you in the next one, mwah 🫢

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from