rtw_cbuf_empty(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ¦‹ rtw_cbuf_empty(9) β€” straight from the Kernel API Manual, bestie πŸ¦‹

okay so picture this: you're deep in the kernel, staring at a cbuf like πŸ‘€, and you just gotta know β€” is it empty or not? That's literally the whole job of rtw_cbuf_empty, no cap. She's a little helper from the rtw_cbuf family and she answers exactly one question, but she answers it flawlessly. πŸ’…


✨ NAME ✨

rtw_cbuf_empty β€” test if cbuf is empty πŸ«™

Like, the vibe check of cbuf functions. Does it have anything in it or is it giving empty? That's it, that's the function.


πŸ’– SYNOPSIS πŸ’–

bool rtw_cbuf_empty (struct rtw_cbuf *cbuf );

one argument, one boolean return, zero drama. icon behavior fr fr ✨


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • cbuf β€” pointer of struct rtw_cbuf 🧚 the actual cbuf you're lowkey interrogating. You pass the pointer, she does the rest.

🌈 RETURN 🌈

returns true if cbuf is empty πŸ’€

that's it. that's the whole return value. no secret third thing, no hidden enum, just true for "yep, empty" (and, by obvious implication, not true when it's got stuff in it). πŸ‘‘

ngl, this one's a one-trick pony and that's literally her charm. don't overthink it bestie 🫢

🌸 SEE ALSO 🌸

  • Kernel file ./drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/osdep_service.c πŸ“ β€” that's where she lives, go say hi
  • rtw_cbuf_full(9) β€” the opposite queen πŸ‘‘
  • rtw_cbuf_push(9) β€” putting stuff in πŸ“₯
  • rtw_cbuf_pop(9) β€” taking stuff out πŸ“€
  • rtw_cbuf_alloc(9) β€” making a cbuf exist in the first place ✨

okay mwah, that's the page πŸŽ€βœ¨ this lil writeup matches the rtw_cbuf_empty(9) entry from the Kernel API Manual, sourced from ./drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os... (that's the truncated path, she's shy πŸ™ˆ), dated October 2026. go check your cbufs bestie, ily, bye πŸ’œπŸ¦‹

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from