rproc_handle_trace(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

🌸 rproc_handle_trace β€” Kernel API Manual energy πŸŽ€

okay so bestie, welcome to the rproc_handle_trace(9) page πŸ’… this is the one that deals with a shared trace buffer resource, and honestly? it's giving "quietly doing the most important job in the room" ✨


✨ NAME ✨

rproc_handle_trace β€” handle a shared trace buffer resource 🫢


πŸ’« SYNOPSIS πŸ’«

int rproc_handle_trace (struct rproc *rproc , void *ptr , int offset ,
       int avail );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • rproc β€” the remote processor πŸ‘‘ like, the whole reason we're here
  • ptr β€” the trace resource descriptor πŸ“‹
  • offset β€” offset of the resource entry πŸ“
  • avail β€” size of available data (for sanity checking the image) 🧠✨

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

so when the remote processor dumps trace logs into memory, this function's whole gig is exporting it via debugfs πŸ’– periodt.

rn, the 'da' member of rsc should contain the device address where the remote processor is dumping the traces πŸ“Œ no cap, that's where the juice lives.

later we could also support dynamically allocating this address using the generic DMA API 🌈 but lowkey, currently there isn't a use case for that πŸ™ˆ so we're not doing it.


🌟 RETURN 🌟

0 on success, or an appropriate error code otherwise πŸ’€ bestie either it ate or it didn't, there is no in between.


πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

Kernel file ./drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c β€” go read it, iykyk πŸ“–βœ¨

the whole friend group, in order 🫢:


and that's the page bestie πŸ’œ it lives in ./drivers/remoteproc, it's dated October 2026, and it will always be rproc_handle_trace(9) to me πŸŽ€βœ¨ slay, go unload your trace buffers responsibly πŸ’…πŸŒΈ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from