ring_buffer_empty_cpu(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

🌸 NAME β€” ring_buffer_empty_cpu(9) 🌸

Okay bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual page for ring_buffer_empty_cpu(9) β€” it’s giving β€œone tiny question, huge ring-buffer energy.” The actual NAME tea is:

ring_buffer_empty_cpu β€” is a cpu buffer of a ring buffer empty?


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

bool ring_buffer_empty_cpu (struct trace_buffer *buffer , int cpu );

Lowkey that’s the whole signature, no cap. Copy it exactly if you’re typing it out, because we do not edit kernel API signatures in this group chat. πŸ’…

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • buffer β€” The ring buffer. Yes, literally the ring buffer you’re working with, bestie.
  • cpu β€” The CPU buffer to test. Like, the specific CPU buffer you’re checking. πŸ‘‘

πŸ¦‹ SEE ALSO πŸ¦‹

Kernel file ./kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c β€” that’s the kernel file, periodt. And then the whole extended friend group:


That’s the whole page, bestie β€” the NAME, the signature, the args, and the see-also friend group. No missing details, no weird edits, just the full ring_buffer_empty_cpu(9) moment. 🫢

Cute sign-off time: source/version ./kernel/trace, dated October 2026 β€” ring_buffer_empty_cpu(9) out, mwah πŸ’‹

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from