request_key_rcu(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… request_key_rcu(9) β€” like, the Kernel API Manual one, bestie πŸŽ€

Okay so real quick β€” we're in request_key_rcu(9), which lives in the Kernel API Manual, and it's literally about requesting a key from an RCU-read-locked context. Yes that's the whole vibe. Buckle up. πŸ¦‹


✨ NAME ✨

request_key_rcu β€” request a key from an RCU-read-locked context 🫢


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

struct key * request_key_rcu (struct key_type *type , const char *description , struct key_tag *domain_tag );

That's the whole signature, no cap. Three args, one struct key * coming back at you. πŸ’–


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • type β€” the type of key we want. Like, the category, the genre, the aesthetic of key. πŸ”₯
  • description β€” the name of the key we want. This is how we're identifying our little guy. ✨
  • domain_tag β€” the domain in which the key operates. Every key's got a home turf. πŸ‘‘

πŸ’œ DESCRIPTION πŸ’œ

So the whole point, bestie: you request a key from a context where you may not sleep β€” think RCU-mode pathwalk, the kind of place where taking a nap is not an option. 😭 Keys that are still under construction? Ignored. Not even looked at. We don't do works-in-progress here. πŸ’…

Here's what comes back: ✨

  • a pointer to the found key if it worked β€” slay, main character energy πŸ‘‘
  • -ENOKEY if we couldn't find a key at all β€” tragic, we searched, nothing πŸ˜”
  • some other error if the key we found was unsuitable or inaccessible β€” not me finding a key I'm not allowed to touch πŸ™ˆ

πŸ¦‹ SEE ALSO πŸ¦‹

All the sibling functions, fr fr β€” go read 'em, they're iconic in their own right. 🌈


Okay that's the page!! It comes to you straight from ./security/keys and it's dated October 2026, and honestly? A whole serve. Byeee bestie, go request some keys responsibly β€” remember, NO SLEEPING in that context. 😴🚫 πŸ“πŸ§šπŸ’œ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from