release_upd...cks_for_mdev(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… release_update_locks_for_mdev(9) β€” the Kernel API Manual, bestie

okay so picture this: you're deep in the kernel, you just finished updating a KVM guest's APCB, and now you have to let go of the locks in exactly the right order or everything's gonna be a mess. That's this function. It's from the Kernel API Manual and honestly? It's giving "quietly iconic cleanup era." πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

release_update_locks_for_mdev β€” releases the locks used to dynamically update a KVM guest's APCB, in the proper order. no cap, the order is the whole point. πŸ¦‹


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void release_update_locks_for_mdev (struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev
);

πŸ’– ARGUMENTS πŸ’–

  • matrix_mdev β€” a pointer to a struct ap_matrix_mdev object containing the AP configuration data to use to update a KVM guest's APCB. like, that's the data you're working with. 🫢

πŸ”₯ DESCRIPTION πŸ”₯

The proper unlocking order is literally this, do not freestyle it:

  1. matrix_dev->mdevs_lock
  2. matrix_mdev->kvm->lock
  3. matrix_dev->guests_lock

that's the sequence. that's the vibe check. release them out of order and, well, the manpage doesn't even want to talk about it. 😭

the ordering is the whole personality of this function β€” item 1, then 2, then 3. periodt. πŸ‘‘

πŸ™ˆ NOTE πŸ™ˆ

If matrix_mdev is NULL or is not attached to a KVM guest, the KVM lock will not be released. so like… don't count on it. it's not being shady, it's just how it is. πŸ’€


🧚 SEE ALSO 🧚

Kernel file ./drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c β€” that's where the magic lives.

like yes that's a lot of friends but they're all important, i don't make the rules πŸ’œ


mwah, that's the page! 🌈 this lil masterpiece lives at ./drivers/s390/crypto and it dropped in October 2026 β€” go read it, slay, and always unlock in order. πŸ’…βœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from