register_sysctl_sz(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… register_sysctl_sz(9) β€” kernel API manual, but make it make sense

okay bestie, so you know how sysctls are those little /proc/sys knobs everyone's obsessed with? this is the function that puts a whole table of them on the map. it's register_sysctl_sz from the kernel API manual, and yes, the sz is doing actual work here. let's go 🫢


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

struct ctl_table_header * register_sysctl_sz (const char *path , const
const struct ctl_table *table , size_t table_size );

no cap, that's the whole signature. take a sec. breathe. 🧚


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • path β€” the path to the directory your sysctl table lives in. and here's the cute part: if the path doesn't exist, we will create it for you. built-in, no extra charge, we love a helpful function πŸ’–
  • table β€” the table structure itself. and this is the serious one, so listen up: the caller must ensure the life of the table is kept during the lifetime use of the sysctl. like, it must not be freed until unregister_sysctl_table is called with the table you got back from this registration. πŸ’€ that's the whole contract, do not break it.
ngl there's a little escape hatch though: if your code is non modular, then you don't need to call unregister_sysctl_table at all, and you can instead use something like register_sysctl_init β€” which does not care for the result of the sysctl registration. bestie said "not my problem" and honestly? valid 🌸
  • table_size β€” the number of elements in table. that's it. that's the size. πŸ’…

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

so what does it do? it registers a sysctl table, obviously. your table should be a filled-in ctl_table array β€” a completely 0 filled entry terminates the table, so that's your stop sign, iykyk ⭐

for more details, go see __register_sysctl_table. that's where the actual lore lives πŸ‘‘


🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

kernel file ./fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c β€” go read it, it's giving main character energy:


okay and that's the page! πŸŽ€ this whole thing lives under ./fs/proc in the kernel tree, it's from the October 2026 era of the docs, and it's filed as register_sysctl_sz(9) in case you need to find it again. slay, go register some sysctls responsibly, and don't free that table early bestie I'm begging πŸ™ˆπŸ’œ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from